The Seventh Circuit affirmed that incurring attorney fees in a frivolous lawsuit brought by a governmental entity can constitute a substantial burden under RLUIPA this week. It also reversed a determination that the City of Chicago had demonstrated the city had not imposed a substantial burden on a religious outreach center's religious activities by denying licenses required to conduct those activities. Judge Richard A. Posner wrote the opinion for the court, and Judge Richard D. Cudahy wrote the following, exceptional concurrence: "Unfortunately, and I think the opinion must be stamped with a large ‘MAYBE.’” Judge Ilana Rovner was the third vote. Another notable aspect of the case is that, like most RLUIPA cases, it has been in litigation a long time—nine years. As Judge Posner wrote, “We can understand the judge’s desire to end a litigation that will soon have lasted as long as the Trojan War, but we do not think that the end is yet in sight.”
Showing posts with label 7th Circuit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 7th Circuit. Show all posts
Thursday, June 4, 2015
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
7th Cir: Notre Dame must submit form to avoid paying for contraceptives
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Notre Dame's request for court-ordered exception to the contraception mandate under the Affordable Care Act. The case had returned from the Supreme Court after the high court decided Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius. Find the decision here.
Judge Richard Posner wrote the forty-page majority opinion, with Judge David Hamilton writing a concurrence. Judge Joel Flaum dissented.
Judge Richard Posner wrote the forty-page majority opinion, with Judge David Hamilton writing a concurrence. Judge Joel Flaum dissented.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
7th Circuit: Milwaukee Archdiocese’s cemetery trust fund not off limits from sex-abuse victims in bankruptcy court
In the
latest opinion interpreting the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act
(RFRA), the Seventh Circuit concluded that the 1993 law does not require the
court to exclude a $55 million cemetery trust fund from the Archdiocese of
Milwaukee’s bankruptcy estate. The case, Listecki v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors,
involves the question of whether a 2008 transfer of the money from the
archdiocese’s general fund to a newly created trust.
Monday, December 1, 2014
Seventh Circuit dismisses appeal, allowing Catholic teacher's in vitro fertilization suit to go forward
This post is being published on both Law Meets Gospel and Indiana Education Law Blog.
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Wayne–South Bend’s appeal from an order denying summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by a former teacher suing the diocese for firing her because she became pregnant through in vitro fertilization was dismissed by a decision. In the unanimous decision written by Judge Diane S. Sykes, the Seventh Circuit held that the appeal was filed too early because the summary-judgment order was not final.
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Wayne–South Bend’s appeal from an order denying summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by a former teacher suing the diocese for firing her because she became pregnant through in vitro fertilization was dismissed by a decision. In the unanimous decision written by Judge Diane S. Sykes, the Seventh Circuit held that the appeal was filed too early because the summary-judgment order was not final.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Seventh Circuit holds challengers to parsonage exemption lack standing
The Seventh
Circuit unanimously rejected a challenge to the parsonage exemption brought by
the Freedom From Religion Foundation, concluding
that the Wisconsin-based, nontheistic group lacked the legal ability to
challenge the statutory exception granted to “minister[s] of the gospel.”
Because the Seventh Circuit concluded the plaintiffs did not have standing, it
did not reach the question of whether the parsonage exemption runs afoul of the
First Amendment. The opinion
reverses a decision
of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin that held the
provision unconstitutional as violating the Establishment Clause of the First
Amendment. (You can listen to the very interesting oral argument here.*)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics
- 501(c)(3) (3)
- 6th Circuit (1)
- 7th Circuit (5)
- Affordable Care Act (2)
- Alito (1)
- bankruptcy (1)
- breakaways (1)
- Brethren (1)
- cemeteries (1)
- compensation (2)
- contraceptive-coverage mandate (2)
- copyright (1)
- criminal law (2)
- definition of religion (4)
- employment law (6)
- ERISA (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- First Amendment (4)
- FLSA (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (3)
- fundraising (2)
- governance (1)
- homeschooling (1)
- Illinois (1)
- immigration (2)
- Indiana (8)
- Jehovah's Witness (1)
- Jewish (1)
- marriage (1)
- meetings (5)
- minimum wage (1)
- ministerial exception (2)
- minutes (2)
- neutral principles (2)
- overtime (1)
- Pagan (1)
- parliamentary procedure (4)
- planned giving (1)
- Presbyterian (2)
- property (2)
- religious exemptions (6)
- RFRA (5)
- RLUIPA (3)
- Robert's Rules of Order (3)
- Roman Catholic (3)
- roundup (5)
- same-sex marriage (1)
- schism (1)
- schools (2)
- sexual misconduct (1)
- Sotomayor (1)
- standing (1)
- substantial burden (1)
- taxes (2)
- Tennessee (1)
- Title VII (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (4)
- Wisconsin (1)