Saturday, August 23, 2014

Weekly roundup for August 23, 2014

Here are the posts from this week to the Law Meets Gospel feeds on Twitter, Facebook, and blog.


Posts to the blog

 Stories from around the Internet posted to the feeds









Have a question about legal issues affecting religious organizations? Let me know at questions@lawmeetsgospel.com, www.facebook.com/LawMeetsGospel, or @LawMeetsGospel.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Make decisions in live meetings, which doesn't mean in person

The modern age seems to have brought us two things: more meetings and more ways to meet. But what are the limits of how we can or should use technology to help us make decisions more efficiently? Deciding that means thinking about why we meet and what we give up when using technology to make decisions. The short answer is that teleconferences and Skype are acceptable means to make a decision, e-mail and chat rooms are not. And none of these is permitted unless your organization's governing documents expressly allow for electronic meetings.

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Don't vote on minutes—It's a waste of time!

Every religious organization I've ever been a part of has meetings. And inevitably there are minutes for those meetings. And for some reason we feel like we should vote on them, which means we ask for a motion, and a second, and then the vote. It turns out that this not only feels like a waste of time, it is a waste of time.

Monday, June 30, 2014

What Hobby Lobby Says and What That Means for Religious Organizations


File:Hobby Lobby, Trexlertown.JPG
© Wikimedia Commons user CyberXRef
Today the United States Supreme Court held on a 5–4 vote that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) prohibits the federal government from forcing a closely held corporation to provide contraception to which the company’s owners object based on their sincerely held religious beliefs. This will likely mean that the Obama administration will extend the accommodations made to religious nonprofits under the Affordable Care Act (A.C.A.) will also apply to closely held corporations that have religious objections to some or all types of contraception. While the decision did not involve religious organizations, they can take this decision as providing more room to use nontraditional structures for purposes churches don’t typically pursue.