The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Notre Dame's request for court-ordered exception to the contraception mandate under the Affordable Care Act. The case had returned from the Supreme Court after the high court decided Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius. Find the decision here.
Judge Richard Posner wrote the forty-page majority opinion, with Judge David Hamilton writing a concurrence. Judge Joel Flaum dissented.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Ind. Ct. App.: First Amendment blocks pastor's wage claim against former employer-congregation
The Court of Appeals of Indiana held that a pastor could not sue the church that formerly employed him for wages and vacation pay, concluding that the lawsuit would require the court to inquire into intrachurch matters, which the court reasoned is forbidden by the First Amendment. In Steven Matthies v. The First Presbyterian Church of Greensburg Indiana, Inc., No. 16A01-1409-PL-380 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 8, 2015), Pastor Steven Matthies sought to enforce part of a three-year contract that he argued entitled him to salary and vacation pay after his employment ended.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
7th Circuit: Milwaukee Archdiocese’s cemetery trust fund not off limits from sex-abuse victims in bankruptcy court
In the
latest opinion interpreting the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act
(RFRA), the Seventh Circuit concluded that the 1993 law does not require the
court to exclude a $55 million cemetery trust fund from the Archdiocese of
Milwaukee’s bankruptcy estate. The case, Listecki v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors,
involves the question of whether a 2008 transfer of the money from the
archdiocese’s general fund to a newly created trust.
Monday, December 22, 2014
Who should adopt minutes for an annual members' meeting?
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Ex Officio Committee Members
Committees with ex officio members should include those
people in their notices of meetings, but when someone is a member ex officio of
all committees, the ex officio member is not
counted when determining a quorum. (Typically, this is the president, but in
the model constitution, this is the president and senior pastor.) These ex officio
members are only different from regular members in their obligation to attend
committee meetings. In other words, they have all the privileges of a member,
but they are usually exempted from the responsibilities. On the other hand,
when someone is an ex officio of a specific committee, that person has all the
rights and obligations of another member, so the only difference is the method
of selection (member due to office rather than other means of selection).
Monday, December 8, 2014
Considerations when offered a planned gift
You’ve just received word that one of your long-time donors has decided to leave a large gift, but it’s in the form of a planned gift. It might be as simple as naming your organization in the donor’s will. Or it might be a more complex mechanism like a trust or an annuity. One of the questions you need to keep in mind is what happens if your group ceases to exist or changes its name. While the default legal rule is that any reference to your organization will be treated as referring to the group’s successor, there are situations in which that is not true. And thinking about the possibility at the time of the gift can save a lot of trouble later.
Monday, December 1, 2014
Seventh Circuit dismisses appeal, allowing Catholic teacher's in vitro fertilization suit to go forward
This post is being published on both Law Meets Gospel and Indiana Education Law Blog.
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Wayne–South Bend’s appeal from an order denying summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by a former teacher suing the diocese for firing her because she became pregnant through in vitro fertilization was dismissed by a decision. In the unanimous decision written by Judge Diane S. Sykes, the Seventh Circuit held that the appeal was filed too early because the summary-judgment order was not final.
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Wayne–South Bend’s appeal from an order denying summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by a former teacher suing the diocese for firing her because she became pregnant through in vitro fertilization was dismissed by a decision. In the unanimous decision written by Judge Diane S. Sykes, the Seventh Circuit held that the appeal was filed too early because the summary-judgment order was not final.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Topics
- 501(c)(3) (3)
- 6th Circuit (1)
- 7th Circuit (5)
- Affordable Care Act (2)
- Alito (1)
- bankruptcy (1)
- breakaways (1)
- Brethren (1)
- cemeteries (1)
- compensation (2)
- contraceptive-coverage mandate (2)
- copyright (1)
- criminal law (2)
- definition of religion (4)
- employment law (6)
- ERISA (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- First Amendment (4)
- FLSA (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (3)
- fundraising (2)
- governance (1)
- homeschooling (1)
- Illinois (1)
- immigration (2)
- Indiana (8)
- Jehovah's Witness (1)
- Jewish (1)
- marriage (1)
- meetings (5)
- minimum wage (1)
- ministerial exception (2)
- minutes (2)
- neutral principles (2)
- overtime (1)
- Pagan (1)
- parliamentary procedure (4)
- planned giving (1)
- Presbyterian (2)
- property (2)
- religious exemptions (6)
- RFRA (5)
- RLUIPA (3)
- Robert's Rules of Order (3)
- Roman Catholic (3)
- roundup (5)
- same-sex marriage (1)
- schism (1)
- schools (2)
- sexual misconduct (1)
- Sotomayor (1)
- standing (1)
- substantial burden (1)
- taxes (2)
- Tennessee (1)
- Title VII (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (4)
- Wisconsin (1)