Thursday, November 20, 2014

What to do when hiring a person with DACA status

One of the biggest postelection debates in Washington surrounds President Obama’s legal authority to grant of legal status to undocumented immigrants. The discussion is the latest chapter in a series of events that included the Obama administration issuing in 2012 what has become known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). DACA gave legal status to certain undocumented immigrants who were under thirty-one on June 15, 2012. Although the current debate is about expanding a similar status to others, which President Obama seems set to announce, this post covers the basics of DACA for the purpose of churches and other religious organizations hiring someone with DACA status. Specifically, it addresses which tax and other forms organizations first hiring someone with DACA status to use. In other words, it answers the questions whether someone who falls under DACA qualifies as an Other U.S. person as defined by form W-9 and, if so, whether that person would need to meet other requirements or fill out other forms.
 
The answer to the first question is yes: an individual with DACA status meets the definition of U.S. person for tax purposes because the person is almost certainly a resident alien under tax law. This is because DACA status requires criteria that necessarily would mean the individual would meet the substantial-presence test.

The answer to the second question is not for the W-9. All the W-9 requires is the sworn statement that the signatory is a U.S. person. But there are other items that employers need to take care of, including Form I-9 from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Monday, November 17, 2014

Indiana Church of the Brethren district cannot take title to breakaway congregation

A local district of the Church of the Brethren could not assume the title of the property of a Northern-Indiana congregation that broke away from the Anabaptist denomination, according to an opinion from the Indiana Court of Appeals. The congregation had not incorporated suggested language in its deeds or in its governing documents necessary to give the church the authority to take over the congregation’s property in the event of a split.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Roundup for November 15, 2014: Parsonage exemption, Buddhist and Presbyterian splits, rappers, free resources

Here are the posts from this week to the Law Meets Gospel feeds on Twitter, Facebook, and blog.


Posts to the blog

 Stories from around the Internet posted to the feeds


Have a question about legal issues affecting religious organizations? Let me know at questions@lawmeetsgospel.com, www.facebook.com/LawMeetsGospel, or @LawMeetsGospel.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Seventh Circuit holds challengers to parsonage exemption lack standing


The Seventh Circuit unanimously rejected a challenge to the parsonage exemption brought by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, concluding that the Wisconsin-based, nontheistic group lacked the legal ability to challenge the statutory exception granted to “minister[s] of the gospel.” Because the Seventh Circuit concluded the plaintiffs did not have standing, it did not reach the question of whether the parsonage exemption runs afoul of the First Amendment. The opinion reverses a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin that held the provision unconstitutional as violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. (You can listen to the very interesting oral argument here.*)